New Page 2

Southwest Mississippi Rural Health Coalition
Home Staff Members News Calendar Programs

Home
Up
Staff
Members
News
Calendar
Programs

 

February 2, 2006

National Coalition Registry Shows Alcohol, Marijuana and Tobacco Most Common Concerns for Community Coalitions

 

Alcohol, marijuana and tobacco are the top problems noted by the nearly 1,000 coalitions participating in CADCA´s 2005 National Coalition Registry. Two-thirds of coalitions cited alcohol as the substance causing the most problems for their coalitions. Marijuana (59.3 percent), tobacco (51.3 percent) and methamphetamine (32.9 percent) also were cited as problem substances.

CADCA’s Registry is a Web-based survey that covers topics including basic coalition descriptive information, e.g., geographic target area, budget, and degree of focus on alcohol, tobacco and other drug (ATOD) issues; activities/strategies; monitoring and evaluation activities; sustainability efforts; and coalition membership.

The Registry was developed to provide policymakers, researchers, and practitioners a single source to access up-to-date and undisputed information on coalition information for funding, programming, and research purposes. The main data collection period was January to April 2005. CADCA targeted coalitions through its various networks, asking coalition leaders to take part in this important endeavor—and 981 coalitions responded.

Preliminary analyses of the Registry data provide a brief overview of coalitions by self-described scope, activities/services commonly engaged in, and primary substances of concern to coalitions. For example, most coalitions (52 percent) identify themselves as county/regional coalitions while 29.3 percent self-identify as city-wide and 7 percent as faith-based. Among the responding coalitions, 22.3 percent cited a budget between $100,001 and $500,000. Only 3.3 percent said they have a budget over $1 million while 14.6 percent said they do not have a budget.

But while the budgets are relatively small, coalitions’ activities are extensive. More than half (53.8 percent) report coordinating development of community laws and policies that discourage substance abuse and 51.6 percent say they leverage enforcement of such laws. Nearly half (48 percent) coordinate drug-free social and recreational activities in their community and 46.2 percent say they are involved in media advocacy, media literacy and social marketing activities linked to substance abuse reduction. Most coalitions list information dissemination (73.2 percent); media awareness (63.9 percent) and community mobilization (57.5 percent) as direct services/activities they provide.

So what do all these numbers mean? While these findings are only preliminary and additional data analyses are planned, some initial insights can be gleaned. Coalitions use local data to assess, plan and evaluate their activities. Among the respondents, 85.2 percent report collecting data on at least one of the four core measures required for Drug-Free Communities Support Program funding. Forty percent report collecting/utilizing arrest/incarceration data and 36 percent report they collect/utilize alcohol/drug-related traffic fatality data.

Additionally, 65.7 percent of respondents report collecting data to determine or monitor the extent of substance abuse problems in their community; 59.7 percent report collecting data on risk/protective factors for substance abuse and other related problems and 61.6 percent report using data to prioritize substance abuse needs. Nearly 60 percent (58.4 percent) say they have developed a logic model for their coalition.

BACK TO NEWS ITEM LISTING

 

Southwest Mississippi Rural Health Coalition